pop culture
potpourri
peeping tom
personal
movie rating

Home > all movies > movie index > 2001: A Space Odyssey
Movie Reviews -- 2001: A Space Odyssey
Review of 2001: A Space Odyssey
Reviewed by Young Il Kim

Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Bunch of nobodies

Let me go on the record by saying that Stanley Kubrick is one of the most overrated directors in the history of cinema. He is credited with directing what the critics consider the best dark comedy, Dr. Strangelove. He also did The Shining, A Clockwork Orange and Full Metal Jacket. With the exception of FMJ, all of these movies suck. He is sort of like Mother Theresa. In Hollywood, you are not supposed to make fun of Kubrick. For years, I have been fruitlessly sending Leno a joke that starts off, "Kubrick, Mother Theresa, and Princess Diana walk into a bar." Perhaps no movie is more raved by critics than 2001: A Space Odyssey. I had the misfortune of seeing this twice. First time was for my high school Academic Decathlon competition (yes, I know. I am a dork.). Second time was for a class taught at Harvard (like I said, I know).

2001: A Space Odyssey continues a story that began with The Planet of the Apes. You have two groups of apes. One tribe uses bones as weapons. The other has Charlton Heston. The first tribe is also backed by music from Richard Strauss. Hard to compete against a monkey faction that marches to the beat of "Also Sprach Zarathustra." And then there's something about a monolith and the monkey throws a bone in the air. It was a good throw because, by the time it comes down, it is the year 2001. In the year 2001, they discover another monolith on the moon. So it is up to the Pentium-chip driven Hal 2000 to accompany Dave and his fellow astronauts to explore Jupiter because the monolith said so. Don't piss off the monolith. Look what happened to the monkeys.

Along the way, we are supposed to believe that monotone Hal 2000 has artificial intelligence and is looking to sabotage a mission that will lead the human race into an accelerated evolutionary growth. Kubrick is trying to show that these monoliths are supposed to symbolize the next big step for mankind. If you ask me, I think he got a bit carried away during his trip to Stonehedge.

I wanted to give this movie a fair shot. After all, I had to watch it for an academic competition and for a class. I tried to put this into the historical context. The movie was made in 1968, a year before Apollo 11 landed on the moon. Star Wars was a good nine years away. RFK and MLK were murdered. My parents started dating (thank goodness!). And Kubrick was on LSD. Okay, I don't know about the last part, but it is quite obvious when you see the last part of the movie when Dave, the lead astronaut, witnesses a light show for like five minutes. And, yes, if you were trippin', you would appreciate that scene so much more.

Perhaps, I hate it because I don't get this movie. But, if I didn't get this movie, and I am a cinema geek, my guess is that most people didn't "get" this movie. And since you probably won't "get" this movie, don't get this movie the next time you are at Blockbuster.

Read user comments

Add your own comments:

the movie
User Comments

jackp
dsl and lsd are they opposites?
10/23/05

Nick
Obviously, this reviewer needs to stick with more intelligent movies he/she can comprehend and relate to, like "Dumb and Dumber"!
10/21/03

More comments...
Add your own review


Copyright © 2000-2001 CampusNut.com Inc. All rights reserved
[ About Us | Our Mission | Investor Relations | Press | Media Mentions ]
[ Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | FAQs | Write For Us | Advertising Info ]